Question to boxing historians: Is this era of heavyweights really that much better than the heavyweights of the 80s?

question for my boxing historians or anybody around during 80s boxing

Is this current era of heavyweights any better than the guys from the 80s?

I remember years ago people were saying AJ is just an oversized Frank Bruno .. imagine an era when Frank Bruno was a Top 3 heavyweight for 7 years

Wilder is my fav , but its widely accepted Wilder was a guy with zero boxing tech and 100% elite right hand and athleticism . He was also Top 3 for 5ish years

Fury went life and death with an MMA fighter , and could have lost any of his trilogy fights against a guy the whole boxing community knows has zero technique . And yes Fury was the guy to end Klitcshko era , but it seems nobody wants to admit Klitchko was 39 years old with 60+ pro fights and has been fighting top heavyweight fighters for close to 15 years . Father time finally caught up with him

Dubios is the new Top 3 heavyweight , and lest not forget he also quit twice both against Joe Joyce and lastly against Usyk

---

I ask this because I see people constantly say Mike Tyson fought in a weak era .. so him doing all the exact things Usyk did (unified the division, go undisputed, clear the division of all the top dawgs) , somehow doesn't qualify him for Top 10 HWs Ever .

So my honest question .. is this era really that much better than the 80s era outside of the current fighters being Super Giants ?