A couple of unpopular opinions
Hey guys, let me tell you a few of my opinions, i'm wondering how much would you agree / disagree and why.
Here's my opinions on all 3 games:
ME1 - the best storyline - you start as a commander who gets a simple mission that goes sideways, then in no time shows that saren is the real baddie, get upgraded massively (spectre) and gets a mission from space council basically to stop saren. The adventure begins. Massive worldbuilding, quests, interesting storyline, aLOT of action. Then we get Vigil, and Sovereign talks which are insane!! Overall the story is straightforward and good and not as convoluted and wierd in me2, or simple as in me3. Why convoluted in me2 - you get Saren in 1, become a cerberus in 2, and end cerberus and return as spectre in 3. But 3 is straightforward - save as many for a final war. 2 is convoluted as in - get people, do side missions, get more people, get abducted, go kill collectors. But my biggest gripe with ME 2 is the end boss. TOO EASY. IT looks abysmally good. IT looks like darksouls boss terminator awesomeness. And then you end it in like.. what.. half a minute? If only that fight was more.. interesting.
me3 - except the ending which could have been done easier differently the thing that i most miss in me3 is ENDGAME BOSS. There is none. Where's Harbinger? The one that taunted us whole time? Y U NO 1v1 Harby? >! If they put like that 'run' to citadel as the last place where you 1v1 with your army vs Harby and then after you destroy him you get to the 'choice' i think that would be much more impactful. Or if they after you killed harby just made a one big ass long cutscene with all the choices deciding how it ends.. no crystal child, no shooting the ..catalyst or whatever the tubes are.. !<
what do you guys think?