[High Stakes] Is every seed winnable?

Obviously a better player could win on a seed that a worse player might not. There are skills to develop that can make your winrate more consistent, that's why this game is fun. Thats like the whole idea behind card games, how can you adapt to randomness to form a coherent strategy from it?

Im curious though, can you be "so good" at balatro that you could win any seed on any stake? Is that the theoretical skill cap, or are there some seeds that simply cannot be won on higher stakes without having knowledge of them beforehand to inform your decisions?

I'm on the gold stake grind and have claimed 4 so far (I'm just going in deck order). Black Deck has made me feel like the worst player in the world and I am stumped on Blue Stake. I know if I keep the grind up I'll make my way there eventually, some seeds are just easy mode, but this variance in difficulty got me wondering how consistent can one even get on high stakes on the Black Deck? Am I only kinda bad or am I REALLY bad?

I think this is a really interesting topic but I'm not so interested in the inevitable bad faith points from people who just wanna call others bad at a single player video game. You're very skilled and cool, now, ego aside, what are your thoughts on this? What would you say your winrate on gold stake is? How likely are you to reroll an entire run early if it doesn't seem to be going well, or do you see every seed through to the bitter end, in victory or defeat?