THIS Is What Needs To Be Spread. Strong Evidence that Exposes the Data Manipulation. Simple and Difficult to Dispute.
When data is sorted by precinct turnout in this large county, below 65% turnout, Harris and \"yes\" votes on abortion measure closely align, as does Trump and \"no\" votes, as expected. A striking and interesting thing happens at 65% turnout and above. Following the dotted lines (presidential votes), you see a point at where the red and blue lines cross at 65%. This is when Trump votes begin to overperform the \"no\" votes and Harris votes begin to underperform the \"yes\" votes. WAIT! But, that's not all. Notice that Trump votes (red dashed line) still generally follows the shape of the \"no\" votes and that Harris votes (blue dashed line) follows the shape of the \"yes\" votes, AND, the underperformance of Harris (difference between the dashed blue and yellow lines) MIRRORS the overperformance of Trump (difference between the dashed red and solid red lines). A simple algorithm that triggers at 65% turnout and takes a certain percentage of Harris votes and flips them to Trump would explain this. It is difficult to impossible to explain this by organic voter behavior. It's also less likely Dems manipulated this to \"win\" down-ballot races as could be alleged in other races. Also, the abortion measure failed because it needed more than the simple majority it did receive. This is seen in other races (Russian Tail) across the country and not in other election years as a control. However, IMO this presentation of the data exposes the manipulation best. Thus, #HeDidntWin and #HeStoleHerVotes. #ElectionTruthAlliance
Edited to add: Credit for this graph goes to members of the Election Truth Alliance: u/dmanasco, u/ndlikesturtles, u/eristic, u/mykki-d and u/soogood.
