Camilla Tominey: What I was reporting about the Duchess of Sussex seven years ago appears as relevant as ever

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/18/reporting-duchess-sussex-seven-years-ago-relevant-as-ever/ (Unarchived)

https://archive.ph/uoRyj (Archived)

*** Article slides included in post

Camilla Tominay, taking an "I've been telling ya'll, but ya'll weren't listening" victory lap.

SMM: That’s our line. 😄

Some snippets:

What should we make of claims in Vanity Fair that podcast staff needed “long term therapy” or took extended breaks from work after working with the Duchess of Sussex?

Suffice to say, this is not the first time I have heard that both Meghan and Harry, 40, were tricky to work for. As I reported in the aftermath of Megxit in 2020 – palace staff had taken to nicknaming them “Duchess Difficult” and “The Hostage”.

As an aide warned me at the time in no uncertain terms: “She’s not just difficult, she’s dangerous”.

It was in the autumn of 2018 – around six months after Harry and Meghan’s fairytale wedding – when I first got wind of the happy couple’s diva-ish behaviour.

I was branded a “racist”, a “liar” and even received death threats for challenging Meghan’s truth, but it seems other people’s truth may finally be catching up with Meghan.

Considering the number of whoppers that have some out of the F*cking Grifters' mouths, I'm more inclined to believe "other people's truth" than Hank and Princess Catherine's sister-in-law.