And if everything ends in the same?

This is more of a theory than something that I have a lot of evidence about or that I know a lot about, etc, but I have heard something about this out there, read something.

Life is in a certain way the "recycling" of the previous, of the same in different ways, genetics is that, houses, lands, some songs, music style, recycle that with some changes, etc.

And if the advances of technology and AI and etc, have already happened and by continuing and building on the previous things, in a certain way they regenerate that same thing?

As a child I believed, like many others, that this was all there was, the world was this present that happened and life was about seventy, eighty years and doing the best possible, and that was all in the present of this world, standard eight-hour jobs, everything more or less regulated and standardized.

And if the AI, advances, since this is mostly all it knows, in a certain way it regenerates the same thing? And if it has already done so?

What makes us think that it goes to something very different, be more utopian or dystopian, etc.

It is difficult for me to imagine a society in which everything is simply fine and there are resources for everyone, energy for everyone, considering that this could be achieved yes, even in the present, but it simply does not happen.

But it is also difficult for me to imagine that this leads to something very dystopian.

Maybe everything will be more or less not to different from what it is now.

This is something that can be explored in more detail, yes, this is just a general look of the concept.

PD: It reminds me of a part of the Matrix, you must already know it and it must have been cited here a few times, more than once surely.

In one part one of them says that they tried to give humans a more "utopian" world and they didn't like it, they didn't adapt, etc, many believed that it wasn't real, etc.

It they were given something very dystopian there would be difficulties too.

So they were simply given the same world they were already in, with some changes perhaps but generally the same.

Because, humans need that activity, imperfection, that intermediate world, and much of life is based on that.

Like religion, there is no way to demonstrate it but there is also no way to totally not demonstrate, that is why it is called faith, believing just for believing, and it can be argued that there is some evidence about religion, God, but not very clear and they are interpretative, etc, and the same about the opposite of this, proofs of its not existence, etc.

And around that there is a whole system, "business", something for humans to do, etc. If that were removed, what would humans do?, at least those related to that, which are not few.

And this applies to many matters, life is based a little on that in-between, we are awake but we also sleep, there is a day but also a night, etc.

That is life itself, human life. I don't know how much of that could change, if it happens to change.

And, finally, I don't know how much can be "controlled" about that, which is what is being tried a little now, controlling advances, technology, directing it to this side or that other side, etc.

Life is something that just happens, I don't know how much can be controlled.